Search for: "Courts and Judicial System" Results 9701 - 9720 of 26,745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 7:58 am by Carol Steiker and Jordan Steiker
 When racism appears in its broader, systemic form, the court retreats because of the impossibility of cabining relief. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also rebuffed arguments about limits on opt-out rights (cannot disregard time limits) and judicial inefficiencies (worries about courts being flooded by filings were overstated). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:53 am by Claire Darbourne
The new arrangements will be enshrined in UK law and enforceable through the UK judicial system, up to and including the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:37 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
The constitutional and statutory limits of mandatory detention have been tested in the courts, but the judicial journey has been a long one. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
As described by Alex Loomis at Lawfare, Abassi held that before extending Bivens to a context not previously approved by the Supreme Court, courts should carefully evaluate whether Congress might doubt the efficacy of a damages remedy as part of the system for enforcing the law and correcting a wrong. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Adriana S. Kosovych
  Chipotle’s timekeeping system also reset at a certain time each night, automatically clocking out any employee who had not already done so. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:06 am by Miquel Montañá
But if we take into account that in the closest prior art (EP 957 and EP 268), the double seal system used precisely prevented this filling from occurring, it should not have been so obvious that the double seal could be substituted by the system taught in ES 219. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm by Amy Howe
But in this case, he concluded, “the lone peril” “seems to me the possibility that we might permit the government to deny someone his liberty longer than the law permits only because we refuse to correct an obvious judicial error. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:29 pm by Michael Broyde
For some time, rabbinical courts struggled to find their footing in the American legal system. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm by Kevin Johnson
Such a rights-based system, however, fits uncomfortably into the much more limited constitutional protections historically offered to noncitizens. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
Now available from the UK Supreme Court shop and from the artist, Isobel Williams, The Supreme Court, A Guide For Bears. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm by Christine Corcos
Now available from the UK Supreme Court shop and from the artist, Isobel Williams, The Supreme Court, A Guide For Bears. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:24 pm by Peter Margulies
As Justice Frankfurter, one of the Court’s historic champions of judicial restraint, noted in a decision cited by Chief Justice Roberts in Nken, balancing the equities is a process “as old as the judicial system of the nation. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:22 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Nobody tracks them in the system and neither police or jails ask arrestees about dependent children upon intake. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:27 am by Matthew Kahn
  In addition, NSA is also charged with the protection of U.S. national security systems, including Department of Defense worldwide computer networks and other systems. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:03 am by Joy Yusi
That would be anarchy: Neil Macdonald - CBC NewsPrince Harry says nobody wants to be king or queenEx-Sheriff Joe Arpaio to defend reputation at criminal trial Government of Canada announces judicial appointments in the province of OntarioSupreme Court of Canada allows BC privacy lawsuit against Facebook despite site's terms of use Globe and MailCourt Refuses To Deduct Earnings During Notice Period - Employment and HR - CanadaOntario's ant-panhandling Safe Streets Act to… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:53 am
MSPB, the Supreme Court (per opinion by Justice Ginsburg) held: [I]n mixed cases . . . in which the employee (or former employee) complains of serious adverse action prompted, in whole or in part, by the employing agency’s violation of federal antidiscrimination laws, the district court is the proper forum for judicial review. [read post]