Search for: "In re A. V."
Results 9701 - 9720
of 62,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2021, 1:54 pm
He lost before the IJ, he lost before the BIA, he lost in the district court, and now it's 2021, and we're just now getting a Ninth Circuit opinion. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:52 pm
You're 39 weeks pregnant. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 12:38 pm
Sometimes you're writing to the Supreme Court to try to convince it not to reverse you.Today's opinion reads like the latter.It's a Judge Reinhardt opinion in a police shooting case that reverses the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants.That single sentence is all you have to know to understand why the opinion is moderate, restrained, and extraordinarily careful in its analysis.Judge Reinhardt has three things going for him in this… [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:06 pm
Of course that's what you're doing. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
I'm not a thousand percent certain that you can permissibly do that in the context of criminal statutes, since there's arguably a Due Process right to be notified of what you're allowed or not allowed to do under penalty of incarceration. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 2:31 pm
You're gonna get convicted on that one.What's the sentence? [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Harmless error.Even when you're in your 50s, a lesson that you probably learned as a child still applies:Saying "Sorry" often goes a long way. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
The reader is basically left entirely in the dark about what we're talking about.The opinion also, strangely, feels the need to drop a footnote that defines what a credit card is. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:36 pm
But amongst the ways in which the world has changed fairly recently is that, at least as I perceive it, we're starting to get more days like today in the appellate world. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:30 pm
But if you were fine with putting the guy in jail for 14 months and then getting "supervision" for the next 14 months in the community, I'm not sure why you're all of the sudden unhappy with the guy being in jail for 14 months and then getting immediately deported.Seems like the latter thing is good for everyone -- or at least everyone in the U.S. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
We're not reinstating your appeal. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:22 pm
You're "peeling" the "cap" back. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
(Partners too, I suspect.)But, on this one, you're Sisyphys, not Zeus.P.S. - Amongst the lawyers that the Ninth Circuit lists on the caption as representing the plaintiffs are three lawyers for "Munger Golles & Olson LLP" (spelled that way not once, but twice, for two different Munger offices). [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
" "Full damages and suffering that more likely than not resulted from re-prioritization of treatment modalities for Gerri Siner based on her existing ‘DNR’ order that was left in place without full agreement and consent of her Surrogate decision makers . . . . [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 9:52 am
Before the birth, however, the individual doctor, whom the parents had chosen, suffered a death in the family, and they were re-assigned to the Defendant. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 12:39 pm
He says that means that you're "gambling" under Washington law because the chips are "things of value" -- i.e., have value because they let you keep playing the game.Importantly, the panel holds that this is gambling not because some people sell these chips on a secondary market (e.g., the chips have "actual" cash value). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
Which is not exactly what you want as your campaign slogan, and what you're probably hugely worried might be your electoral opponent's campaign slogan against you.But as a "Talk to the hand" argument, sure, it doctrinally works. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm
You're instead required only to produce sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact could conclude that, yep, this stuff more likely than not came from the guy. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:07 pm
"You're an asshole" understates the appropriate critique. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:44 am
They're sentenced to 30-to-life because one (indeed, two) of their accomplices died.And there's more.As is often the case, there's a plea deal for some of the participants, who then agree to testify against the others. [read post]
