Search for: "J. C." Results 9701 - 9720 of 19,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 6:40 am by Russell Jackson
In Levinson, some Missouri plaintiffs brought a putative nationwide class action against J&J and Wal-mart, alleging that J&J's Baby Shampoo and Wal-mart's Equate Tearless Baby Wash contained trace amounts of chemicals that increase the risk of cancer, cause skin irritation, and can lead to asthma and hypersensitivity. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 10:19 pm by FDABlog HPM
(CC) The patent information submitted under [FDC Act § 505(b) or (c)] is withdrawn by the holder of the application approved under subsection (b). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 2:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kay also tweeted links to organizations providing Plan B and Plan C abortifacient pills. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Coral Beach
” Your significant violations are as follows: Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls (Subpart C): 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:44 am
Henry Carr J considered the six unregistered designs chosen by the parties. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:50 am
 J 21/80, J 16/82, T 324/90, and T 239/92 ). [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
The Spain’s action gave birth to Cases C-146/13 and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:44 am
This morning he released his Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH [available in, amongst others, Italian but not English!] [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
The CJEU has just issued its much-awaited decision in Case C-419/13  Art & Allposters, addressing the adaptation right in the InfoSoc Directive and copyright exhaustion. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
” [para 72]One of the artworks that Oslo municipality is trying to have registered as a trade mark:The Angry Boy (Sinnataggen)The rationale of the various absolute grounds for refusal of registrationAccording to the Court this also follows from consideration of how Article 3(1)(b) to (e) of the Trade Mark Directive acknowledges the need to keep a sign available for general use [para 73, referring to paragraphs 33 ff in the 2008 Opinion of AG Ruiz-Járabo… [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
   The German (Düsseldorf) and Dutch courts found the opposite and concluded that Article 3(c) was not met. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
§ §6 and 8 shall take effect on 9/9/07 the one hundred eightieth day after this act shall have become a law; c. [read post]