Search for: "People v. House" Results 9701 - 9720 of 12,708
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Adam Wagner
He said that his hand were tied as The scope of the Convention jurisdiction within the meaning of Article 1 has been addressed by the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Bankovic, and by the House of Lords and the Supreme Court respectively in Al-Skeini and Smith v Oxfordshire. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 am by Bart Torvik
 People getting in each other'sfaces is something that happens without either party being psycho; people goingover and choking someone for no reason, not so much.As you know, I'm on record saying that the whole courtshould resign.GILLETTE:  Given what I know of him, allowing Walker to appoint anentire new supreme court is a bad idea.I am not sure that charging him, if that is what happened,gives him license to push her. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am by Russ Bensing
The purpose of the bill is to reduce the number of people in Ohio’s prisons; currently, there are slightly more than 50,000 inmates residing in facilities designed to house 38,000. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:31 am by Dan Hunter
 A couple months ago, CaseClothesed reported on Christian Louboutin filing a lawsuit against New York rival luxury fashion house YSL over the use of Louboutin’s trademarked red soles (Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:22 pm by Richard Pildes
When it comes to filling vacant House seats, the Constitution is clear: Art. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm by Erik J. Heels
  Besides IP law, I'm good at spotting trends, connecting people on social networks, fixing things, boiling eggs, and a handful of other things. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm by Kristina Araya
In People v Antwine, No. 297287, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s suppression of evidence seized from the home, and reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the case. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm by Barry Barnett
The Chief Justice seems to have taken Bleak House as his starting point because the outcome in Stern v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by Orin Kerr
§ 228 (childsupport payments); see also United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm by Josh Blackman
This mirrors his rejection of the Slaughter-House Cases in McDonald v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
Fortunately for sellers, the law in Georgia protects home owners who sell their house to people who later suffer from "buyers remorse" and want to sue them to rescind the sale. [read post]