Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 9701 - 9720
of 23,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2024, 9:00 am
§§ 6-103; Mylan Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:10 pm
Coble v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am
Alaska v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
Frankly, I think there is no irreparable harm: Thales has five licensing offers from Philips on the table, and Thales's customers have no reason to assume that Philips would actually want to bar Thales from selling its products. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
The majority says that this risk attends any descriptive mark, but not all descriptive terms are comprised of generic components: while one need not use “soft” to sell one’s mattresses, one generally must use mattress to do so. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 8:16 am
Trademark * Carter v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
In the Hermès v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 1:20 pm
Lyondell Chemical Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:55 am
Fraser v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:21 pm
As discussed in a guest post on this site last week (here), on December 14, 2018 the Delaware Supreme Court published its opinion in Dell, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 4:38 am
Morgan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am
Considering that WSW, as a distributor, was selling the N°9 perfume under a legitimate license from SLC and removed the alleged infringing goods online immediately after receiving notification from the plaintiff – and that WSW had only sold two bottles of the N°9 perfume (bought by the plaintiff) – the trial Court exempted WSW from paying damage liability. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 9:31 am
Bowen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:43 pm
See Shepard v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
No doubt the open space was a selling point. [read post]
