Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 9701 - 9720
of 28,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 7:26 am
This case does not decide if New York City is misinterpreting state law. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
In a recent decision out of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Bielec v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:35 am
In a per curiam opinion in Zubik v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:50 pm
Of Eng’rs, Architects & Surveyors v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court most recently relied on that rationale in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:13 am
Miss World Limited v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:00 am
That group includes the mall, the owners of the mall, the City of Elliot Lake, and a number of architects and engineers, Quinte v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:34 am
See Illinois v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) heard another appeal in the Cleveland Clinic v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 5:27 am
In the case of Diawara v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:33 am
The decision sheds light on what the Court wants the complaints to look like.The case is Bohnet v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:56 am
Pildes analyzed the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" Finding that "in light of all of the circumstances of this case, the penalty of termination is not irrational and does not shock the conscience," the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should not have granted that branch of the Plaintiff's petition seeking to vacate the penalty of termination of the Plaintiff's employment as a tenured teacher.* Citing Matter of Watkins v Board of Educ. of Port Jefferson Union Free School Dist., 26 AD3d 336,… [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:27 am
They stated that their farming activities were carried out in accordance with "normal farm practice" so that, under the legislation, they were protected from any civil action in "nuisance, negligence or otherwise, for any odour, noise, dust, vibration, light, smoke or other disturbance resulting from an agricultural operation. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:43 am
He writes to state that Title VII does not actually say that defendants only get reverse fees if the plaintiff's case is frivolous. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
The motivation behind the proposed rules stems from the 2018 Supreme Court decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:50 am
That's what happened here.The case is Munter v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:23 am
In 2006, for instance, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated as simple fact in eBay v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:30 am
VideoShare filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:08 am
The Supreme Court clarifies that question.The case is Endrew F. v. [read post]
