Search for: "York v York"
Results 9701 - 9720
of 50,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2017, 7:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Town of East Hampton, New York v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:14 pm
Federal District Court issues TRO baring the furloughing of state workers by Executive OrderDonohue v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, CV-00543A federal district court judge, holding that the union's action alleging proposed actions by the Governor would violate the rights of the employees they represent in violation of Article 1.10.1 of the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 4:16 pm
In Seung Jin Lee v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:59 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York invalidated two of the King patents at issue in the case, U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
The petition of the day is: New York v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:07 pm
You wouldn't think so, and the Southern District of New York did not think so in the recent decision Agence France Presse v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
On July 30th, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a decision in York University v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
Opponents cite the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision a year after Litle in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:03 am
In Raybourne v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:23 pm
" (Campbell v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 8:03 am
Arista v Doe [read post]
31 May 2008, 8:11 pm
Supreme Court's historic decision in the case of Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 7:46 pm
On Thursday, the New York Court of Appeals (which is that state's highest court) issued a decision in National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 3:13 pm
The court held that a dispute that had become moot in the usual sense of that word — the problem was resolved before the case even went to trial — could be litigated nonetheless, because there was still something at stake: the one dollar the plaintiffs were seeking as damages for an asserted violation of their First Amendment right to free speech.The holding was surprising in its generosity to the plaintiffs, as was the 8-to-1 vote, but that’s not what made Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 1:51 pm
Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:00 am
See, People v James D. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Tucker v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
Thus, said the court in Carbon Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
