Search for: "Ex Parte Mays" Results 9721 - 9740 of 12,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Malta International Extradition Treaty with the United States May 18, 2006, Date-Signed July 1, 2009, Date- In-Force Extradition Treaty Between the United States of America and the Government of Malta, Signed on May 18, 2006 at Valletta, with an Exchange of Notes With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Extradition Treaty between the United States of America and the Government of Malta, signed on … [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:57 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent Nos. 6,021,433 and 6,735,614 that claim contact alerts for incoming messages (see ex parte Request No. (15) & inter partes Request No. (5)). [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:00 am
As part of the deal, Mariotti had to promise to stay away from his ex-girlfriend. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:00 am
As part of the deal, Mariotti had to promise to stay away from his ex-girlfriend. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:39 pm
” Related Web Resources: Federal Investigators Expand Inquiries Into Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Practices, BNA Securities Law Daily, May 11, 2011 Wall Street inquiry expands beyond Goldman Sachs, Los Angeles Times, May 14, 2011 Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Commodity Futures Trading Commission More Blog Posts: Ex-Goldman Sachs Board Member Accused of Insider Trading with Galleon Group Co-Founder Seeks to Have SEC Administrative Case Against Him… [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:48 am by Andrew Sutter
And as for waiver, the SPA said this, in relevant part: “6.4 Amendment and Waiver. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:45 am by Daniel Richardson
  The threats were in response to his correspondent’s complaints about her ex-boyfriend, the victim here. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:29 am by Walter Reaves
Although they never even mentioned Padilla a two-page opinion from the Court of Criminal Appeals last week raises the question of whether the court considers it to be retroactive The case is Ex parte Herrera. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Ex Parte Roque César Nido Lanausse (Puerto Rico Court of Appeals, Guayama Judicial Region, Panel XII, Case Num. [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:47 am by Mike Aylward
The junk fax wars seem to be cooling down, as the ISO exclusion has for the most part cut off coverage under policies issued after 2004. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
This is one of a series of posts that will excerpt sections from the third edition of my book, Day on Torts: Leading Tennessee Tort Cases. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:30 am by familoo
A friend of mine (Thanks JA) drew my attention to some very apt observations of Munby J (as he then was) in a case called R v LSC (ex parte Bateman), which remind me very much of a lecture by Lord Hoffmann I attended as a pupil – in which he extolled the virtues of choosing one’s best points, two at the most. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:33 am by Marie Louise
207/10 Orifarm v Merck and Paranova v Merck Sharp & Dohme (IPKat) EU: European Court of Justice considers embryonic stem cell ban: Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace eV (Patent Docs) India: Border push in EU FTA to hit pharma exports (GenericsWeb) US: BPAI seeks further briefing on claim encompassing “400 billion oligomers”: Ex parte DeGrado (Patent Docs) US: FDA completes implementation of Affordable Care Act sec. 10609 “generic loophole” provisions (FDA… [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
 RAFRA further provides that the State may use any unused portion of the RAFRA block grant for its Medicaid program, with 50% of the unused federal Medicare funds thus diverted counting as part of the State’s contribution to Medicaid and the other 50% counting as federal matching funds. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:19 pm by Brandon W. Barnett
Not too much there for law nerds to get excited about, but it goes to show that a meritorious claim may receive favor from the Court. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:13 am by Holli Hartman
”  All of this means that the de­fen­dants are likely still on shift­ing ground when it comes to as­sess­ing the to­tal li­a­bil­ity it may be fac­ing. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am by Stefanie Levine
Microsoft, relying in part on dictum in KSR, has asked the Court to reduce the evidentiary standard to preponderance of evidence (POE) at least in situations where the PTO has not considered the prior art now being asserted against the patent claims. [read post]