Search for: "People v Goode" Results 9721 - 9740 of 20,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which held that the toy was protected under the reasoning of Rogers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:47 am by Steven M. Gursten
Phil’s become something of a good luck charm for me, and has helped out on several of my biggest recent trials including Broeren v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And that would argue for a greater role for registration, which I think is a desirable outcome: it would be good to channel people into registration by making it hard for them to win when they haven’t registered; I wrote a whole article about that. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Supreme Court watchers could be forgiven if last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:47 am
There are two limits on acceptability: a) We don't want to send people we think quite dangerous to countries that will simply release them or release them after a very short period; and b) We shouldn't send prisoners to countries where they will be tortured (although it's quite possible that anybody who could have been sent to such a country has already been sent there by the Bush administration).2) Some number of detainees will be released on the ground that there is no… [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm by Stuart Kaplow
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act… [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm by Chris Martin
.), it's also easy to imagine that the struggle for civil rights ended in the 1960s, when segregationists in the South lost their fight against the Civil Rights Act and Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:25 am by John Culhane
v=yMLZO-sObzQ There’s also a pretty good play, and more parties than you can shake a groove thing at! [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. [read post]