Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 9721 - 9740
of 16,997
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
No — even if some people say there is, there isn’t. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 1:03 pm
However, plenty of people with an ‘undesirable’ physical characteristic are not impaired in any sense of the word. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm
The interim order was unsuccessfully challenged and Carr was granted an injunction against the press until further notice (Carr v News Group Newspapers [2005] EWHC 971 (QB)). [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 2:46 pm
,v NCD strongly recommends an increase in the 2015 budget for IDEA funding and a 10-year pathway to full funding and rigorous outcomes-based accountability.NCD looks forward to working with the Administration to ensure that students with disabilities are given the opportunity to thrive in school and beyond. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Van Praagh v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
[David Kopel] Ninth Circuit strikes California’s restrictive rule against licensed carry of handguns
13 Feb 2014, 10:17 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in Peruta v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
Case citation: Kolodziej v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 2:44 pm
” Third Issue: The People cited the case of People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
To hold otherwise, the Court held, would expect far too much perfection from our legal system.By contrast, despite the fact that many people desperately try to get out of jury service, sometimes, you've got someone who's trying desperately to get on. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:23 am
The defendants’ motions to dismiss were granted (Duke v Hamil, February 4, 2014, Story, R). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:07 am
” In Ter Beek v. [read post]
