Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 9721 - 9740 of 13,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 9:17 am by Kiran Bhat
The petition of the day is: Title: Henderson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:32 am by Dennis Crouch
Whether the removal of those works from the public domain violates the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm by Jeff Gamso
United States and the formal relevant issue is whether, when a federal court resentences a person for some reason, the court may consider evidence of rehabilitation since the original sentencing. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm by Mike
 Today, the writ is somewhat different, it protects individuals who 1) are confined by judges who apply rules contrary to the Constitution of the United States as determined by the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 8:21 am by Keith Rizzardi
There is an annual season for lethal removal for wild animals in most of the United States and particularly in the states surrounding Yellowstone Park. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:38 am by Matt Sundquist
Martinez (2010); Seth Waxman and Ted Olson in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:06 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix.
In HM Treasury v Ahmed, the Supreme Court had considered section 1(1) of the United Nations Act 1946 Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Today’s first petition of the day is: Title: Burris v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:46 am by Conor McEvily
petition of the day is: Title: McGill v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Howard Wasserman
First, this case is going to be considered of a piece with last term's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:55 am by admin
  The BPP guidelines, published online by the United States Bankruptcy Court, clearly state: The bankruptcy petition preparer is not an attorney and is not authorized to practice law. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Randolph thus reversed the district judge’s ruling ordering the release of the petitioners—seventeen Uighur refugees from China—into the United States when the government failed to justify their detention or resettle them elsewhere. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 5:40 am by Conor McEvily
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia) Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Innocence ProjectJurisdictional statement and petition for writ of habeas corpus   [read post]