Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M" Results 9721 - 9740 of 33,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 6:53 am
It's difficult to find the words to express, or perhaps explain, why our government's efforts, our candidates' promises, seem as if they must somehow be in our best interest, yet don't make us feel much better about our prospects. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
It has also come to be the prevailing view that ‘(m)ost of the law concerning disqualification because of interest applies with equal force to . . . administrative adjudicators. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
I recall quite a few State Bar of Arizona Section meetings being held there. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:28 am by Kenneth Anderson
When I ask why, if this is so, a US presidential administration would not be interested in staking out serious — even if, in my view, seriously wrong — foreign policy positions, the answer is, in some sense, reflected in President Obama’s speech last night — hence, my second interest in it. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 6:36 am by Joy Waltemath
Agreeing with a state unemployment compensation review board that a fired HR VP’s tweet did not violate her employer’s social media policy, a Pennsylvania state court held that her tweet was not willful misconduct under state law. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:50 am by Daniel Shaviro
Suppose Sweden has a preference for high taxes and a big welfare state; the UK for low taxes and only a small welfare state. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:08 am
  Author’s Note: For professional reasons I’m positive Mazy will edit this next part, which in all fairness he should. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:19 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting thought about moot court, from Prof. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 9:39 am by Jeffrey J. Randa
Beyond just liking what I do, I have a strong interest (and perhaps that's eccentric), in the principles of alcoholism, addiction, cross-addiction and recovery. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 5:30 pm
The state court judges have an interest in the impact of the "mis-named Class Action Fairness Act of 2005" particularly the question of its impact on the caseload in complex litigation departments in California state courts. [read post]