Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT" Results 9721 - 9740 of 36,412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by Thomas Long
Case date: 14 February 2019 Case number: No. 17-2510 CourtUnited States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
Part III will explain why the United States Supreme Court is likely to hold that the taking in Kelo does not violate the federal Constitution – thereby continuing to reserve the power in the states to make such determinations. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:30 pm by Amy Howe
At the same time, the district court made clear that in a criminal trial, with a jury that would have been required to make its findings “beyond a reasonable doubt” —  a higher standard of proof — “the United States would have lost. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Michigan State University in 1968 and his Masters degree from Michigan State University in 1971. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:56 am by Lev Sugarman
Pildes analyzed the 1983 Supreme Court decision in INS v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:36 am by Deborah Heller
Construction would impact threatened and endangered species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA); impact critical habitats for endangered and threatened species; impact federal lands including National Parks, National Monuments, wildlife refuges, wilderness areas, and wild and scenic rivers; and impact Waters of the United States that are protected by the Clean Water Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Hornak of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in the case of Kirkpatrick v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 pm by Lev Sugarman
  The Aspen Institute is an Equal Opportunity Employer and complies with all District and federal laws. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm by Erik Slobe
United States Postal Service, which will determine if the government is able to initiate review proceedings for patents. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 12:46 pm by Kish Law
 Also, the State rarely has Assistant District Attorneys who are as well-schooled in the intricacies of asset forfeiture as are the federal Financial Litigation Unit attorneys I see on a regular basis in my federal matters. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:41 am by Emma Zack
Senior United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Jed Rakoff comments: The National Academies’ report on Strengthening Forensic Science was the first serious and objective look at the forensic science evidence that had for decades been routinely received by the courts — and what it revealed was that too much forensic science did not adhere to basic… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:20 am by Matthew Vance
  In a recent case, the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico granted in part a motion for a protective order brought by an insurance company defendant. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:35 am by Katherine Kiziah
As of February 14, 2019, service members have filed over 150 lawsuits in various state and federal courts. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:35 am by Katherine Kiziah
As of February 14, 2019, service members have filed over 150 lawsuits in various state and federal courts. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:56 am by Richard Hunt
The Container Store, Inc., 904 F.3d 70 (1st Cir. 2018) and remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings.** Smelling victory, the Federation sought to bypass any further proceedings and leap to a final judgment and injunction. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Valentine’s Day Massacre, the Honorable Judge Gonzalo Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California reconsidered and reversed his November 2018 Blockvest decision, sending a powerful message about the illegality of so-called initial coin offerings. [read post]