Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 9721 - 9740 of 24,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 1:03 pm by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
Maryland, the United States Supreme Court held that a prosecutor in a criminal case must disclose all exculpatory evidence in its possession to the defense. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 7:53 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided by the United States District Court, Southern District, Judge Lynn N. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:06 pm
Justice Suttell, invoking an ancient Rhode Island Supreme Court precedent, State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among the reasons frequently cited for the higher incidence of litigation in the United States compared to the rest of the world is the acceptability of contingent fees for plaintiffs’ counsel and general rules that each party to a lawsuit in the U.S. bears its own costs. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
But some states like New York will look at them under the same test - meaning counsel must tailor them narrowly to protect an employer's business interest. -- Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Opinion Date: 10/1/09 Cite: Cenveo Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 4:32 pm by rainey Reitman
 United States (finding the government could not enjoin the New York Times from publishing Vietnam war documents from whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg) and Bartnicki v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:59 am
As in Shotts, we also conclude that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Jackson is inapplicable here. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm by Joe Palazzolo
They point to the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:57 am
I basis for Congress’s action in the Jerusalem passport case, Zivotofsky v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
Garcia requested officers be sent out to [Thomas’] office so they could `sit on the place’ until a warrant could be obtained. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:51 pm
Patil, Trushant Shah, Faramarz Robeny and Fredo Joseph (collectively the "plaintiffs") appeal from a June 2, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Castel, J.), granting summary judgment to defendant-appellee City of New York (the "City") and denying the plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
"Joneca believed that another company had prior rights to the mark in the United states, and when that company let its U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm by Fong & Chun
Malilia was not then eligible for relief, the judge ordered his removal from the United States and Mr. [read post]