Search for: "Welling v. Welling"
Results 9721 - 9740
of 110,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 2:31 pm
"Well now. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
(The firms that represented the plaintiffs below, as well as on appeal, are Quintilone & Associates and the Eisenberg Law Firm.) [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
That voting to acquit might well not be the best possible move she could make if she wanted to be hired for the job to which she applied literally hours previously? [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:21 pm
As well as a profoundly serious one. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Plaintiff says that Nikolay had some naked/sex pictures of plaintiff and distributed them to others, as well as threatened to send them to plaintiff's employer. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:50 pm
The Court of Appeal demonstrates its cultural awareness as well:"Defendants . . . . contend the measure summary and impartial analysis that appeared in the ballot pamphlet materials for Proposition D described the ordinance as authorizing delivery of medical marijuana by vehicles and they maintain that the voters enacting the proposition adopted that construction. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
In a way that might well touch millions of people.Lawyers included. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:07 am
Most (or at least many) people took a well-deserved break last week. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:25 pm
You strongly suspect that you die if you stay in the car (correctly, as it turns out) versus knowing full well (again, correctly) that you'll be seriously injured if you throw yourself from a moving vehicle at 100 miles per hour (or whatever).How horrible. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 2:27 pm
And making the case final now only necessitates that we pay for either appointed counsel to write a petition for review (if the government wins) or pay the Attorney General to write one (if the defendant wins) -- both of which we know full well will be held pending the outcome of the California Supreme Court's decision.Given all the wasted effort, I might just prefer that we hold the case for now, and then quickly and efficiently dispense with the thing once the Calfornia… [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 4:16 pm
Analysis: The Court discussed several principles of statutory construction when the plain language of statutes renders a conflict, including (i) an analysis of the context and legislative history of both statutes, (ii) the precedence of a more recent statute over an earlier statute and (iii) the well-established principle that a more specific enactment governs a more general statute. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 11:58 am
Second, defendant and its counsel knew they'd lose, but hey, you still delay the lawsuit for a year or two while you take the appeal of the denial of the motion to compel arbitration.Exceedingly possible as well, eh? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:16 pm
This holding conflicts with a 1991 decision of the Court of Appeal in a case called Gilman, but is consisted with a different case (Stallman) decided that same year as well as a subsequent decision (Johnson).In my view, it's more than about time for the California Supreme Court to definitively resolve this two-decade old split. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
As well as diminishing whatever residual sympathy a Ninth Circuit panel might have for the petitioner. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
That may well be illegal.But it's only illegal if it's willful, and, geeze, I'm just at a total loss to explain to a nonlawyer -- or even a lawyer! [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 1:02 pm
"Judge Trott then goes on to talk about the importance of not using out-of-context quotations,"the regrettable lesson that the basic information we require to resolve a controversy is not always found in the parties’ briefs, but in the ungilded record itself," and his suggestion (to O'Melveny & others) that "[l]awyers would be well advised not to elide the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
Or, worse, what the jury instructions in such cases should say.Witness this opinion.The majority and the dissent disagree about both what to do in situations like this one as well as what exactly transpired here. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:03 pm
" Well, yeah. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 12:55 pm
But then recalcitrant municipalities -- like the County of Fresno here -- used their local zoning power to outlaw marijuana dispensaries as well as cultivation. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:21 am
once they seize your computer.But if all you do is hit the delete button, even with an evil intent, your malicious incompetence may well not count as a substantive federal offense.Good to know. [read post]
