Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 9721 - 9740
of 31,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:08 am
In Goldwater v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
Then, in Liapes v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:32 am
See Gisel v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting and influential passage, most recently quoted by Judge Posner in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:09 am
” Ackerson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
I would wager the agency struggled to defend in its position in the first place precisely because company names are inherently “identifying” and not intrinsically “commercial. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 1:25 pm
While the most of the fighting took place between Henry VI and his rival Edward IV, the book begins at the turn of the century with Henry IV, and shows how the events of the first quarter of the century, under Henry IV and V, created conditions that would lead to the war. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:50 pm
We’ve been following Watts v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
Last Friday’s post regarding Batoh v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Curll, Stowe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
That would be to place another straitjacket on the law of obviousness. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:01 am
Lindke v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Heller and continued in McDonald v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 10:02 am
The EAT in the current case of Onu v Akwiku, however, found that the decision in Jessemey was wrong. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:09 pm
In Hachette v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
“Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 10:17 am
In Young v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
