Search for: "York v York"
Results 9721 - 9740
of 50,419
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2009, 11:07 am
Retailers with stores in New York should take note that effective November 25, 2009, an amendment to the state's existing refund policy law takes effect. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 1:29 pm
Gould v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:00 pm
Declaratory Judgment Action (v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am
Co. v E. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the New York Times are challenging the District Court for the Southern District of New York’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the government in their consolidated Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:41 pm
New York courts agreed the admission did not violate Crawford v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division, Second Department in Raffellini v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
An Antique Platter of Gold (“Golden Phiale”) and the recently decided Republic of Turkey v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could “recoup” over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 pm
Pursuant to People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could "recoup" over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with… [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 8:44 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:17 am
In Matter of Bronx Committee for Toxic Free Schools v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 6:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:17 am
In Matter of Bronx Committee for Toxic Free Schools v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:36 pm
Related documents: Viacom v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:26 am
I. v New York City Bd. of Educ., 256 AD2d 189; McDonald v Cook, 252 AD2d 302; and Lemp v Lewis, 226 AD2d 907, in support of its ruling. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
Smoke breaks ruled off-duty activity Eckerson v State and Local Retirement Systems, 270 AD2d 705, motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 756 Significant accidental disability retirement benefits are available to members of the New York State and Local Retirement Systems [ERS] who are disabled as the result of an accident incurred in performing official duties. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:57 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
