Search for: "Day v. United States"
Results 9741 - 9760
of 25,657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 3:58 pm
”the close cooperative relationship between the United States and the democratically elected Iraqi government, the strong United States diplomatic presence in Iraq, the significant presence of United States forces in Iraq, and Iraq’s commitment to combat ISIS justify different treatment for Iraq. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:28 pm
For example, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm
But calls to commit a specific crime are generally not constitutionally protected, see United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:54 am
United States) that the abrogation was unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
Under these authorities, I determined that, for a brief period of 90 days, while existing screening and vetting procedures were under review, the entry into the United States of certain aliens from the seven identified countries -- each afflicted by terrorism in a manner that compromised the ability of the United States to rely on normal decision-making procedures about travel to the United States -- would be detrimental… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then continued to assess the evidence, and concluded that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but that the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising that… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:30 am
In 2010, for example, some critics compared the Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 10:01 pm
This year the Town Hall panel is scheduled to include: Al V. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
We had a case preview (which was our most popular post of the year so far) and reports of Days 1 and 2 of Day 3. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:48 am
Unless and until the President retracts those statements or amends them to comport with Julian’s sense (which I share) of what the reality probably is, I think we all have an obligation to take the words of the President of the United States seriously. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm
The government therefore failed to show that he intended to remain in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:03 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:03 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:03 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:03 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:01 am
” With this in mind, the NAFCU pressed Secretary Mnuchin to utilize consultations with the heads of the agencies of the FSOC—as required by President Trump’s “Executive Order on Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System” prior to the issuance of a 120-day report—to work closely with the NCUA to “uncover practical approaches to remedying Dodd-Franks’ regulatory misalignment. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:55 am
The Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
As the New York Times reports, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument this week in Packingham v. [read post]
