Search for: "Ex Parte May" Results 9741 - 9760 of 12,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2011, 9:41 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Now, we learn from Liberty and Justice for Y'all of an important new case that, even though the defendant's habeas writ was denied, will almost certainly, radically change how TDCJ handles parole revocations, requiring preliminary hearings mandated by the US Supreme Court that the agency had been skipping because of convenience, funding, and a desire to help out prosecutors.In Ex Parte Bohannan, the CCA denied relief because TDCJ belatedly held a "preliminary… [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:56 pm by Brandon W. Barnett
”In Ex Parte Bohannan, the applicant (parolee) filed an application for writ of mandamus arguing that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) violated his constitutional rights by failing to hold a preliminary hearing when the State sought to revoke his parole. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:55 am by Fathima Cader
» Renseignements : Andres Garin, Adjoint exécutif juridique (613) 996-9296 [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:00 am by Brandon W. Barnett
Ex Parte Evans - The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals considered a case wherein sex-offender conditions were placed on a parolee for an offense other than a sex offense. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:29 pm
Simply, Kavalam stated that a (single) toolbar may have groups of tools. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE VIII When the person whose extradition is requested is being proceeded against or is serving a sentence in the territory of the requested Party for an offense other than that for which extradition has been requested, his surrender may be deferred until the conclusion of the proceedings and the full execution of any punishment he may be or may have been awarded. [read post]
10 May 2011, 5:19 am by Jon L. Gelman
In the case, Concentra, a health care company, sought to prohibit plaintiff's attorneys from contacting any Concentra Medical Staff member, former or current, on an ex-parte basis. [read post]
10 May 2011, 5:07 am
On May 6, 2011, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its decision in Ex parte Imerys USA, where it held that a referral by an authorized treating physician to another treating physician does not transfer the right to control all aspects of the employee’s medical treatment to the subsequent physician. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:27 am by cdw
  Morehart held that the Arizona constitution’s requirements governing victims’ rights do not trump the right to present a defense and to have certain funding motions heard ex parte. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:48 pm by Timothy J. Maier
The USPTO, in yet another attempt to reduce pendency and streamline patent prosecution, has proposed changes to ex parte and inter partes reexamination procedures. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:33 am by Dennis Crouch
Ex parte DeGrado (BPAI 2011) The University of Pennsylvania's pending patent application No. 10/801,951 is directed to the treatment of microbial infections with an amphiliphilic oligomer. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lawrence Solum
Visas are status-conveyers, and their loss may undermine business and educational opportunities dear to global elites. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:51 pm by Dan Bushell
Per Jeffrey Kuntz of The Florida Legal Blog:  The motion to cancel the January 2011 sale was considered, ex parte, and granted due to "affidavit review. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:47 pm
Alternatively, parties may provide detailed citations to prior filings containing that information. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In certain situations, private ordering may be better. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:15 am by Brandon W. Barnett
This issue was recently decided by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Ex Parte Garza. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:20 pm by Scott A. McKeown
SNQ Review Options Vary Significantly Between Ex Parte & Inter Partes Patent Reexamination As discussed back in March relative to inter partes reexamination, the proper mechanism for seeking review of a denied Substantial New Question Of Patentability (SNQ) may depend on the status of the claims of the proceeding. [read post]