Search for: "In re Grant"
Results 9741 - 9760
of 33,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2014, 8:44 am
Once you've seen the Abu Ghraib photos, they're not easily forgotten. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:30 am
The owner could file a motion to suppress, and based upon the facts presented in the post, that motion would be granted. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
See In re Central Sprinkler Co., where ATTIC was found to be generic for a category of fire sprinklers. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
We're saying that people will never be evicted for rent accrued during the crisis. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 10:40 am
There were several requests for additional time that were granted. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
For instance, I resolve to re-subscribe to Netflix. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 5:34 pm
In re C.C., 2023 VT 16. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:02 pm
Patent owners can pick a forum that is less inclined to grant fees, keep costs down, or stay cases. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:15 pm
Gluck and her colleagues are not answering the question presented-they're begging it. [read post]
23 Mar 2025, 7:56 am
They're writing for you, but what you want is for them to do what's for their own good. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
.), entered October 25, 2023, which granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), unanimously affirmed, without costs. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
.), entered October 25, 2023, which granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), unanimously affirmed, without costs. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 12:44 pm
While the new rules aren’t perfect, they’re greatly improved. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:54 am
Title VII does need to be amended to grant accommodation rights to pregnant women. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
In re Hotels.com) and is deemed unregistrable. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:13 pm
I know what you're thinking. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:14 pm
(Note: Aereokiller has since re-named itself FilmOn X, even though it’ll always be Aereokiller to us.) [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 6:15 pm
The per curiam Court relies on authority that holds a sentence becomes “unbundled” on remand and re-sentencing – ergo, there’s no presumption of vindictiveness when the reversal of a two-year min-mand produces an identical prison (re)sentence. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:06 am
It rejected these argument for a host of reasons and granted the pharmaceutical company’s summary judgment motion. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:13 am
They’re both harmed by false advertising, but their harms are different, as Lexmarkmade clear in the Lanham Act context. [read post]
