Search for: "People v. More" Results 9741 - 9760 of 43,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
More broadly speaking, this case is also a significant step on the long journey of the Metis People towards recognition as unique and rights-bearing aboriginal people, separate and distinct from both the “Indian” (First Nation) and the Inuit peoples, as clearly indicated by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and by the recent decisions of the SCC relating to the Metis People (Cunningham, Manitoba Metis Federation and Daniels). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:44 am by Julia Kaye
Since it was approved in 2000, nearly 6 million people in the United States, and millions more globally, have used this medication. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court holds that a Minnesota law that prohibits people from wearing political clothing in a polling place violates the First Amendment.The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:00 pm
More importantly, it’s unclear how the administration can legally and properly deter people from seeking protection in the first place: As the judge in RILR v. [read post]
16 May 2025, 11:15 am by Unknown
The Advocate General’s Opinion in LC and LP v Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma (Verfassungsblog, May 2025) [text]**For much more news and info on the latest developments, check out the ECRE Weekly Bulletin. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:41 pm by Michel-Adrien
The system’s disproportionate adverse impacts on Indigenous peoples have also been thoroughly studied and documented for over half a century. [read post]