Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 9741 - 9760 of 12,221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Today, the ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Liberty University v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Evidently, the decedent took a bunch of these drugs all at once and died from what the court called “mixed drug intoxication. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:06 pm by Marc DeGirolami
  Compare another wild car chase case more than 20 years ago, People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Although Doherty had not been decided at the time that Kay & Price was, the ECtHR analysis of Kay (in Kay v UK) took the somewhat unusual step of referring to Doherty and finding that not only did the Gateways as outlined in Kay & Price not fulfil the requirements of Article 8, but neither did they as functionally expanded (albeit slightly) in Doherty. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  You can’t have such incompetent people driving taxis, people who know so little about the city, and think that they took actual exams. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:48 am by Jeff Gamso
  We as a people disagree about what's included in speech, for instance (see, e.g., Texas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:31 am
There's something for everyone, including constitutional law scholars, political strategists, readers of supermarket tabloids, and groups pushing to repeal last year's health care reform law.The case is Bond v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
 The case is Oracle v UsedSoft, in which Europe's top court is being invited to rule on whether downloaded software may be traded as "used". [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am by Charon QC
Or, even worse, when people don’t want to hear my advice in the first place. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:04 am by INFORRM
On Friday 18 January a hearing took place in relation to the claim by football agent, Sky Andrew. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Stephen Page
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm by Gabe Acevedo
One vendor that took this new term and ran with it was Digital Reef. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
Even as it sought to undermine all sorts of laws, HavenCo’s model of a data haven still took law itself a bit too much for granted. [read post]