Search for: "SMITH v. STATE" Results 9741 - 9760 of 10,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Smith-Ribner -- with Judges Dan Pellegrini and Mary Hannah Leavitt concurring -- ruled that the MAJ-owned Club Kama Sutra violated its restaurant permit by providing an area on the premises where patrons could openly engage in sexual activity with one another.Judge Rochelle S. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am by Bexis
- New EDPA case requiring unsuccessful plaintiff to pay as costs  part of cost of complying with its ediscovery demands - Link.June 16, 2011:  It Should Be An Interesting Couple Of Weeks - Analysis of new Supreme Court Smith v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:08 am by David Oscar Markus
It is a heavy burden for a lawyer from that oft-criticized office to mount any defense of its prosecutions, but Andrieu repeatedly found ways to botch virtually every point as she argued Smith v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
In constructing this argument, Drury discusses Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am by Ken Lammers
By placing a judge in a courtroom the General Assembly is stating that it trusts this judge's discretion in the use of advisement powers. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:43 am by Lara
Smith 279 F3d 1135 (9th Cir). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:05 am by Mark Methenitis
You could not go anywhere without being told, in all caps, that the law would turn the web into a police state or break the Internet completely. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Paul Ohm
., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer IP Reporter
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts   1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]