Search for: "State v House" Results 9741 - 9760 of 27,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Ors, heard 21 May 2019. [read post]
28 May 2010, 6:47 am by randal shaheen
 For national banks, the new standards will codify existing precedent (i.e., the standards that were articulated by Barnett Bank v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:10 pm by Margaret Wood
  The second of these two cases, Windsor v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
[The Rhode Island Supreme Court case cited in the briefs is State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:53 pm by David Smith
Johnson & Ors v Old [2013] EWCA Civ 415The Court of Appeal has been turning its mind to another of the odd questions that has sprung from the fertile litigious bosom of tenancy deposit protection. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:53 pm by David Smith
Johnson & Ors v Old [2013] EWCA Civ 415The Court of Appeal has been turning its mind to another of the odd questions that has sprung from the fertile litigious bosom of tenancy deposit protection. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, the House of Representatives passed the Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2012 yesterday, a response to the Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Personal Jurisdiction over a Foreign Entity: In most U.S. civil litigation, personal jurisdiction is considered on a state-by-state basis: we ask “does the defendant have sufficient contacts with the state housing the particular court? [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
Also, abandoning the house for personal use and then trying to sell it shortly thereafter (and claiming it is now held primarily for investment) is likely not sufficient under 1031 (although holding the property for a while after abandoning it for personal use may work...see Moore v CIR (2007)). [read post]