Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 9741 - 9760
of 12,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 7:45 am
In Perry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
A Federal court in California has struck down a ban on gay marriage in the state, marking the first step on a path to a United States Supreme Court decision on the issue. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
” In K mart Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:28 pm
But it wouldn’t be unconstitutional if states chose to do so. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:46 am
. - Raymont, V., Salazar, A.M., Lipsky, R., Goldman, D., Tasick, G., Grafman, J.. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:25 pm
In a case captioned State v Federico, the NJ Appellate Division held that a defendant convicted of a DWI offense and multiple other traffic offenses may not be sentenced to more than 180 days in county jail. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:34 am
Carrier, auto accident victims could have a second chance to bring pain and suffering lawsuits If you are one of hundreds of Michigan residents who has been seriously hurt in a car accident that was not your fault, but you were still told you had “no case” by a Michigan lawyer because of the state’s difficult auto accident threshold law, your important legal rights have now been restored with the Michigan Supreme Court’s new auto law, McCormick v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
The state court opinions were driven by Geier v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:56 pm
See Babbitt v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:43 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
New auto law promises hope and a second chance for hundreds of Michigan car accident victims who were told they did not have cases Rodney McCormick v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:39 am
He relied in particular on the judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:01 am
The prevalence of uninsured motorist coverage reduces the chances of damages that may result from lack of insurance. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:10 am
Maryland courts are, as we learned again in Falik v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:10 am
Maryland courts are, as we learned again in Falik v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
Greenhouse writes:It has been nearly three months since the court “invited” — that is to say, ordered — Solicitor General Elena Kagan to “express the views of the United States” on whether laws that take away the right to vote from people in prison or on parole can be challenged under the Voting Rights Act as racially discriminatory.The order came in a case from Massachusetts, Simmons v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 11:02 pm
In Arno v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 4:58 pm
McCurry v. [read post]
