Search for: "State v. Light" Results 9741 - 9760 of 28,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2014, 6:02 am by SHG
It was a second marriage for both Donna Lou Young and Henry V. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 7:58 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Although Rule 2 has been doubted, in light of the substantial body of authority in its support its existence should now be acknowledged. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland (8-27-21) Template Motion to Rescind In Absentia Removal Order In Light of Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:27 am by Rosalind English
The Court’s reasoning This was not a question of ignoring the “strong presumption” that the procedures of other Convention States complied with Article 6, as indicated by Lindberg v Sweden (Admissibility) (48198/99) (2004) 38 E.H.R.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, a cert petition asserting that the state failed to comply in a murder case with its obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence under Brady v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Hill, Julia Raifman and Sandro Galea discuss recent research they conducted that “sheds light on how the denial of services to same-sex couples — such as decorating a wedding cake, in [Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’m delighted to report that the Utah Supreme Court has just handed down an opinion in Butt v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm by Michael McCann
However, at no point of the dispute could Mutu have had his case heard before a national court of a Member State which, in turn, could have referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling and shed light on this matter. [read post]