Search for: "State v. Su" Results 9741 - 9760 of 30,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
Even when no federal law exists to conflict with state or local regulation, subnational rules can be unlawful if their burden on interstate commerce is “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits”—a test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  This was going against the grain of one of the stated purposes behind the reforms to the law of defamation: to reduce, rather than increase, costs. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  This was going against the grain of one of the stated purposes behind the reforms to the law of defamation: to reduce, rather than increase, costs. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  This was going against the grain of one of the stated purposes behind the reforms to the law of defamation: to reduce, rather than increase, costs. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 12:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
” SFJ sued under federal and state public-accommodation discrimination laws, but on Wednesday the U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by Eric Goldman
by guest blogger Alexandra Jane Roberts Last week, California-based burger chain In-N-Out sued Denver-based Smashburger, alleging infringement and dilution of trademarks including DOUBLE-DOUBLE and TRIPLE TRIPLE (for, among other things, “hamburger sandwiches and cheeseburger sandwiches”). [read post]