Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9741 - 9760
of 16,404
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 10:39 am
Not to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which issued its long awaited decision in Joffe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Regarding obviousness, the FCA disagreed with the trial judge’s approach to framing the Apotex v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:21 pm
Perry and United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:18 pm
Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze an important and interesting decision, Demers v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
The trial court initially agreed with the family, by entering a judgement in their favor, but State Farm succeeded in getting the judge to rehear their argument and vacate the judgment based upon the newly-decided Florida Supreme Court case of State Farm v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
” None of them, by the way, state explicitly that foods [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm
Wainwright and United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Schuette v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
See Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:52 pm
Samsung's "final five" patents list now contains two SEPs -- that's 40%, despite the fact that it knows it can hardly obtain an injunction over them.Last month Apple withdrew its FRAND antitrust counterclaims from the second California case (without prejudice, as always), but it still has a strong set of FRAND defenses in this case.Given that this is an important juncture in the case-narrowing effort for Apple v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 3:47 am
Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:04 pm
On Sept. 4, the Court of Appeal increased the fine to $750,000 in its ruling in R. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
In Demers v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
In Duran v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 1:59 pm
According to the 6th Circuit, “If the officer lied on his police report in order to obtain prosecution against Romo, that is strong evidence of malice. [read post]
