Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT"
Results 9741 - 9760
of 36,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
It appears the often bad habits of the military court-room have shown up in federal district court. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Plaintiff, held as a federal prisoner in a state prison, was subject to a separation order from the United States Marshal's Service requiring him to be separated from three other federal inmates being held at the same facility. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
However, that assumption has been upended by recent decisions by the California Court of Appeal and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California invalidating employee non-solicitation agreements. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:50 am
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act states, "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States … shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:26 pm
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on June 15, 2012 released the following: "Gupta Convicted on Four Counts Arising from an Insider Trading Scheme in which He Provided Confidential Information About Goldman Sachs to His Business Partner and Friend, Raj Rajaratnam Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District announced that Rajat K. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:26 pm
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on June 15, 2012 released the following: "Gupta Convicted on Four Counts Arising from an Insider Trading Scheme in which He Provided Confidential Information About Goldman Sachs to His Business Partner and Friend, Raj Rajaratnam Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District announced that Rajat K. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:01 am
Such reissuance (including this section) shall not be subject to judicial review and shall not abrogate or otherwise have any effect on the order and judgment issued by the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming in Case Numbers 09–CV–118J and 09–CV–138J on November 18, 2010. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 1:35 pm
The district court should take a look. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:07 am
For example: Venue — Any lawsuit challenging the removal of a special counsel should be filed before a three-judge district court in the District of Columbia, under 28 U.S.C. 2284, with a right of direct appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:44 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
That's the question the United States Supreme Court considered on Monday in the case of Rubin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
The United States District Court for the District of Colorado granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:40 pm
United States (and three related petitions), the shareholders return to the court to challenge the 2012 amendment under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:25 am
The Court concluded there was no implied right of action, applying long-standing United States Supreme Court authority regarding whether and when to imply a private right of action in a federal statute. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 5:56 am
” The case is In re United States, No. 17A570 (17–801). [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:55 pm
The appeals court pointed out that the DOL’s case would depend on the information received from 150 other state employees who had consented to the disclosure of their identities, and that the state employer already had this information in its possession (Perez v United States District Court, Tacoma, April 18, 2014, Trott, S). [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:33 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana agreed with the plaintiff states and issued a preliminary injunction preventing the termination of Title 42 until the final ruling in the case. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:03 am
U.S., 869 F.2d 1496, (9th Cir. 1989).[7] AP, supra note 1.[8] Id.[9] Id.[10] Treaty of Extradition between the United States of America and the United Mexican States (Mexico), U.S. [read post]
