Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9741 - 9760
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2014, 7:54 am
The mall filed suit in a California state court, alleging state-law claims for trespass and nuisance and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
On February 13, 2009, a Border Patrol agent found and arrested Diaz on a road in California, north of the United States-Mexico border. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:14 pm
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the court found that wholly created AI works cannot be copyrighted. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
For example, if A has sued B in state court for trademark infringement, and the case is about to be decided, a federal court should stay proceedings in the case of B v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:06 am
As Wikipedia explains, under the laws of evidence in effect in the United States, a presumption of a particular fact can be made without the aid of proof in some situations. . . . [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
Procedural HistoryBecton, Dickinson and Company (Becton) and Nova Biomedical Corporation (Nova) appeal the denial of various fees sought based on an eight-year long patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California involving patents owned by Therasense, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
" Indiana: State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
The Milwards appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Spoons, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
Nixon v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
United States, that lower courts should look for and be guided by the “position taken by those Members [of the Court] who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds” (emphasis added). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Yozmot 33 Limited (EPLAW) United States US General Comcast owes P2P users $16; yes, they should take it (Ars Technica) Dow Jones files hot news misappropriation suit against Breifing.com (The Trademark Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms ITC’s findings that Global Locate has standing, SiRF directly infringes patents: SiRF v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Challenge to… [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
Release date Aug 13 Order a copy in advance. https:/… 2019-09-23 Publishers Say Audible's 'Captions' Defense 'Makes No Sense' – Publishers Weekly https://t.co/LwUCaFwbHF 2019-09-23 OPC concludes consultation on transfers for processing reversing proposal to treat transfers for processing as disc… https://t.co/CKTTM8UiiC 2019-09-23 UKSC rules that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful R (Miller) v Prime Minister, Cherry & Ors v… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
United Healthcare of Ariz., Inc. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Prolacto primarily does business in the United States through licensing agreements with individual paleterias in Florida, Texas, Northern California, and North Carolina. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:34 pm
An “aggravated felony” conviction generally requires mandatory removal of an immigrant from the United States and renders the immigrant ineligible for most forms of relief from removal. [read post]
