Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 9761 - 9780 of 14,319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Mark Methenitis
On this LGJ, commentary on the recent Supreme Court decision.Read on! [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  The minority (Lords Phillips, Roger and Brown) went further, finding that this lack of causation should have prevented a cause of action accruing at all. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:45 am by firstamendmentblogger
In today’s Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at how the Court’s ruling in the violent video games case presents Justice Scalia’s and Justice Thomas’s sharply divergent views on what speech rights minors can claim under the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:50 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, coverage of Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:24 am by Blog Editorial
Following the High Court decision that the maximum time that a person can be held in police detention is 96 hours, including time spent on police bail (unless there is new evidence justifying further arrest), and the Government plan to introduce emergency legislation to reverse the decision, the Supreme Court has issued the following ruling: “On 30 June 2011 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom granted permission to appeal in this case and the appeal will be heard on 25 July by Lords… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
SCOTUS concludes another term with a bevy of decisions, the most significant of which was Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:14 pm
Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput has written an essay on the Supreme Court's decision last week in Brown, Governor of California, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
The two appeals in the Privy Council this week are to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Sir Patrick Coghlin. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Supreme Court Term Is Pro-Business and Pro-Free Speech The Supreme Court ended the 2010 term this week, delivering the much-anticipated decision in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]