Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States"
Results 9761 - 9780
of 14,935
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:00 pm
These investigations and allegations obviously make ENI a large target for Justice Department or SEC investigations, not only in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:24 pm
Government did not recognize any government any Somalia that could request immunity for him, and also because Samantar had settled in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
Justice Sotomayor asserted that “Section 5 was created . . . because states were moving faster than” litigation could catch up with new kinds of discrimination; “[a]s the courts struck down one form, the states would find another. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Feb. 27, 2013), the United States Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, held that the five-year statute of limitations for the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to bring a civil suit seeking penalties for securities fraud against investment advisers, codified in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:00 am
Additionally, students can pursue summer experiential opportunities throughout the United States and in Africa and other countries, as part of the school’s Summer Public Interest Law Program. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:15 am
Competition Policy International (CPI) has published a six-page paper entitled "Standard Setting Organizations [SSOs] Can Help Solve the Standard Essential Patents Licensing Problem" jointly authored by three professors, two of whom currently head the economics departments of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition (Kai-Uwe Kuehn, or "Kühn" in German) and the United States Federal Trade Commission (Howard Shelanski) and one of whom recently served as the… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:09 am
By: Gene Quinn (IPWatchdog.com) Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the matter of Bowman v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
United States that a veteran can pursue his lawsuit against the United States alleging that a Navy doctor performed cataract surgery without his consent. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 4:36 am
Former DEA chiefs say Barack Obama's justice department hasn't moved quickly enough on the issue of whether to file a lawsuit that would strong-arm the states into abandoning the legalization measures before they are ever implemented. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 am
Chief Executive Officer Paul V. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:48 pm
Contrast that “meaningful opportunity” with Justice O’Connor’s holding for the Hamdi plurality that “due process demands that a citizen held in the United States as an enemy combatant be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for that detention before a neutral decisionmaker. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 10:03 am
United States, No. 11-1351, slip op. at 4 (U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on February 27 issued its decision in Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
Justice Scalia: Hardest Decision “Probably a Patent Case”One week ago, on July 18, 2012, Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court sat down for an interview with Piers Morgan of CNN. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:35 am
Chief Justice Roberts pointed out that claimants could reduce costs in other ways. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
Padrón, Chief Judge Bertila Soto, former United States Congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart, Harvard Law Professor and noted author Alan M. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 9:31 am
The Chief also pointed out that Mississippi has the "best" ratio.Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin defends his state"“It’s just disturbing that the chief justice of the United States would spew this kind of misinformation.... [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
But in 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
