Search for: "Ex Parte Mays"
Results 9761 - 9780
of 12,876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 2:48 pm
The USPTO, in yet another attempt to reduce pendency and streamline patent prosecution, has proposed changes to ex parte and inter partes reexamination procedures. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:33 am
Ex parte DeGrado (BPAI 2011) The University of Pennsylvania's pending patent application No. 10/801,951 is directed to the treatment of microbial infections with an amphiliphilic oligomer. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Visas are status-conveyers, and their loss may undermine business and educational opportunities dear to global elites. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:51 pm
Per Jeffrey Kuntz of The Florida Legal Blog: The motion to cancel the January 2011 sale was considered, ex parte, and granted due to "affidavit review. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:47 pm
Alternatively, parties may provide detailed citations to prior filings containing that information. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:02 am
In certain situations, private ordering may be better. [read post]
6 May 2011, 6:15 am
This issue was recently decided by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Ex Parte Garza. [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:20 pm
SNQ Review Options Vary Significantly Between Ex Parte & Inter Partes Patent Reexamination As discussed back in March relative to inter partes reexamination, the proper mechanism for seeking review of a denied Substantial New Question Of Patentability (SNQ) may depend on the status of the claims of the proceeding. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 3(2) provides that in cases in which extradition is so refused, the Requesting State may request that the case be submitted to the competent authorities of the Requested State for prosecution. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:54 am
My ex told me she had to file for bankruptcy. [read post]
4 May 2011, 8:05 pm
The proposed changes fall into three categories: 1) changes which affect both ex parte and inter partes reexaminations, 2) changes which only affect ex parte reexamination and 3) changes affecting only inter partes reexamination. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:35 pm
When an individual files for protection in Utah, they will usually obtain a temporary protective order (Ex Parte) against the respondent very quickly from the court. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:32 pm
The proposed changes fall into three categories: 1) changes which affect both ex parte and inter partes reexaminations, 2) changes which only affect ex parte reexamination and 3) changes affecting only inter partes reexamination. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
”[xvi] But it might well be that such a view is overly pessimistic and that we would be able to pursue some private pursuits in part through a) our own efforts to do so, b) the moral forbearance of others, and c) the measures of self-defense we threaten to those who would not forbear and instead attempt to interfere with those private pursuits. [read post]
4 May 2011, 8:00 am
If so, it may be possible for opposing parties, competitors, ex-spouses, or even the government to obtain information about where you were on a given date and time. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:48 pm
Looney, 235 F.2d 429 (10th Cir. 1956):The case it cites is a Supreme Court case from WWII, Ex parte Quirin 317 U.S. 1 (1942), which says:I’m no expert in this subject, but either 1) Stephen Carter is wrong - doubtful - 2) the NYT reviewer is wrong - possible - or, most likely, 3) the NYT reviewer was lazy in summarizing Carter’s statements about unlawful combatants and the Bush administration. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:35 am
centers around claims that the judge had ex parte communication with social worker and improperly took into consideration allegations that defendant had previously abused the victim, his 5-year-old son. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:42 pm
Family Code section 3044 creates a rebuttable presumption against joint legal and joint physical custody where there is independent evidence of domestic violence (as in permanent restraining orders for up to five years, as opposed to temporary orders obtained ex parte that are not upheld at the DV hearing). [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:29 pm
” If the application includes certain information about why the tracking device is necessary, and probable cause exists, then the judge “must enter an ex parte order authorizing the installation and use of a mobile tracking device. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:00 pm
That person may be your ex, but he or she is still your child’s father or mother. [read post]
