Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 9761 - 9780
of 13,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 2:46 am
” Winters v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm
The bottom line is that if the feds are going to go after people for marijuana, it should be the illegal growers, not those who are following local laws in trying to run a legitimate business. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
Georgia, and states could no longer put people to death, until the Supremes changed their mind in Gregg v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
The attorneys of the law firm of Santucci Priore, P.L. have been retained by the Defendants in the case of Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:22 am
On this subject (and probably only this subject) we’re content to let the other side of the “v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:08 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm
Corporate personhood is the legal concept that underpins rulings like the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United v the Federal Election Commission; it means that corporations are considered people under the law, with the constitutional right of free speech. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:57 pm
(See New York Times v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
Leeds Group v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:46 pm
Filburn, Gibbons v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 7:04 pm
(Transcript p. 8, lines 35-37)[18] Later he said:And I don't understand why people just don't do a reasonable thing. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
Bloggers love it when themes collide — when a story reflects one of their pet topics intersecting with an entirely unrelated but equally important pet topic. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
After demonstrators refused to take down or leave the shelter, 31 people were arrested on Sunday and charged with either crossing a police line or failing to obey orders to leave the shelter. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Bruce Springsteen v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:02 am
(in liquidation) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:32 am
The bottom line is that everyone makes mistakes. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
The history supposedly shows a consistent line of opposition, and the implication is that any current attempts to ensure that the exclusive rights of copyright are accounted for as technology progresses are merely attempts to use law to prop up outdated business models instead of adapting. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton argument. [read post]
