Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 9761 - 9780 of 55,566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Here are the concerns that motivate Judge Nelson to concur:"The majority recognizes the possibility that an interpretation of "terrorist activity" that ignores international law could lead to some bizarre outcomes, including classifying as terrorists Jews engaged in armed resistance against the Nazis. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 10:36 am
Roberts, Jr., dropped a fascinating hint that the breadth of Congress' revision of federal habeas rules in 1996 might play a major role in determining the fate of one of the Court's most important precedents in the field: Teague v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
By a majority of 4-1, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the local authority was vicariously liable in respect of abuse perpetrated by the foster parents (applying Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10), and even though the local authority was not negligent in connection with the foster placements. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:20 am
The majority opinion:(A) Affirms the conviction and death sentence. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:20 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The appeals court gave short shrift to the argument by the US, adopted by the district court, that sovereign immunity barred the breach of trust claim, clarifying (consistent with the majority of circuits) that section 702 of the APA, as amended, is a broad waiver of that immunity for claims not seeking money damages. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:05 am
Yesterday, Sir Nicholas Wall continued his fightback against this assault, by arranging for his judgment in CW & Ors v TW to be published on Bailii, notwithstanding that he considered that it was not reportable. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In the landmark 2021 decision of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
’” That is how Chief Justice Mike McGrath referred to the Montana constitution’s provision that ensures the citizens of Montana the “right to a clean and healthful environment” and on which he grounded the majority’s opinion in his December 18, 2024,  holiday gift to the environment and the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:40 pm by Jason Mazzone
Criticism of Judge Hudson’s opinion today in Virginia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 11:17 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
After a severe legal battle, this very important lawsuit prevented said proposal from being implemented, which meant a major offense to the migrant community. [read post]