Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 9761 - 9780
of 13,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 11:21 pm
In Kirby v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
California’s anti-SLAPP statute provides that a complaint which arises from the defendant’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm
In the ID, ALJ Gildea determined that Samsung had not violated Section 337 in connection with the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multi-layer ceramic capacitors by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:46 pm
Urnikis-Negro v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:52 am
United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Louisiana in the case of Barbour v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 11:15 am
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:43 am
In Oliver v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm
United States (09-1227). [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:25 am
Nearly Legal on No admittance : Sharon Horie v the United Kingdom – 31845/10 [2011] ECHR 289. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
” As Wikipedia also notes, the United States has a federal court system with limitations on the cases federal courts can hear, while each state has its own individual court system. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:10 pm
From the first drafts of the upcoming edition: For the Condemned State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 5:59 pm
Sill waiting for an opinion in United States v. [read post]
