Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 9761 - 9780
of 13,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Etherton v City of Rainsville, 2015 WL 6123213 (ND Ala 10/19/2015)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Standing [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:28 am
The efficiency of making the ethanol is simply too low, requiring too much land and too much input of material. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
In Strother v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:00 pm
In Ashton Trust v Caraway, an Arkansas court considered an 86- year-old womans’s penmanship in in determining that she knew what she was doing in selling land, even though her son contended that she had Alzheimer’s. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 10:43 pm
Entertainers, L.L.C. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:36 am
The court found that the defendant was protected from liability by what is known as “recreational land use immunity,” which is contained in the North Dakota state code. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 7:51 pm
Board of Education was the law of the land and should be followed rather than resisted. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:02 am
In Financial Freedom Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
(Justice Willett not sitting)State of Texas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
The court's total deference to the stated reasons for a taking establishes a standard so minimal, it is doubtful that even the majority in Kelo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
In the most recent decision, the Arbitration Panel specifically found that: Claimants are recent immigrants to the United States and they had very limited investment experience. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
Flores-Ortega applied in his case, making it clear to all the lower federal and state courts that this is the “law of the land”: “Contrary to the argument by Idaho and the U. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:16 pm
The case at issue is last year’s C P Aquaculture (India) Pvt Ltd v Aqua Star Pty Ltd [2023] VCC 2134. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:27 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am
In Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court issued a decision in McGirt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am
In the case of the Chicago lakefront, the land south of Madison Street (here is a map from the reporter’s statement in the Lake Front Case, 146 U.S. 387, 397 (1892)) was developed by the commissioners of the Illinois and Michigan Canal, to whom the state had granted the land as a subsidy to encourage the canal’s construction. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:37 am
Alas, I've been busy with other things, and haven't paid close attention to the Salazar v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
It is an Eastland Court of Appeals case styled, Spurlock v Beacon Lloyds Insurance Company. [read post]
