Search for: "State v. Light" Results 9761 - 9780 of 28,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
            With the election of President Donald Trump and the appointment of Ajit Pai as FCC Chairman, muscular network neutrality rules soon will evaporate as the Commission reverts to a general promotion of openness and best practices. [1]  Despite judicial affirmance of an earlier reclassification of broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service, subject to common carrier regulation, the Restoring Internet Freedom Notice of… [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:55 am
            With the election of President Donald Trump and the appointment of Ajit Pai as FCC Chairman, muscular network neutrality rules soon will evaporate as the Commission reverts to a general promotion of openness and best practices. [1]  Despite judicial affirmance of an earlier reclassification of broadband Internet access as a telecommunications service, subject to common carrier regulation, the Restoring Internet Freedom Notice of… [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:32 am by Docket Navigator
"In light of the recent United State Supreme Court case, TC Heartland LLC.v Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC (May 22, 2017), the parties are directed to brief whether venue is proper in this district. . . . [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
So you went to law school right as a generation of legal thinkers was persuading people, bit by bit, that both judicial activism and restraint were misguided, and that courts can and must enforce constitutional limits on the state. [read post]
24 May 2017, 5:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals disagrees, killing off the habeas petition.The case is Waiters v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:38 pm by Claire Poppelwell-Scevak
This strict interpretation of article 12 has a weak point: the dynamic approach of the Court interpreting the ECHR in light of Europe’s present day. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
” In the end, and by distinguishing from US v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:43 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Background And Methodology In April 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Mach Mining, LLC v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
A close reading of the opinion, in light of three later cases decided in the early 19th century, reveals that the Supreme Court intended to recognize "Indian title" while granting the United States a right of first refusal if tribes sought to sell property on the open market to non-Indians. [read post]