Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 9761 - 9780 of 16,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
Matosantos, the new cases raise an issue not raised in Matosantos: whether AB 1X 26 violates the provisions of both the California and United States constitutions prohibiting legislation impairing existing contracts. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:18 pm by Lisa Peters
Scheffer, Northwestern University School of Law, in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York in Support of the Petitioner Brief for the Law of Nations Scholars on Reargument in Support of Neither Party Here are a list of sites to help you follow the court’s term: United States Supreme Court Scotus blog ABA’s Preview of the United States Supreme Court Cases Oyez     [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:32 pm by Jon
Presently, fusion candidacies are allowed in only eight states: Connecticut, Delaware, Idaho, Mississippi, New York, Oregon, South Carolina, and Vermont. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Brian A. Lebrecht
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., et al. was announced out of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 10:42 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The penalties are increased if the victim is a political figure, a concept that might surprise United States journalists who generally receive greater protection against defamation liability when writing about politicians. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:46 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The federal district court in Manhattan yesterday heard arguments in the matter of United States Of America v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm by Ilyse Schuman
On June 22, 2012, the Board granted review in two cases – New York University, Case 2-RC-23481 and Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Case 29-RC-12054 – that present the question of whether graduate student assistants are employees eligible to collectively bargain under the NLRA. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 4:24 am by David J. DePaolo
Exclusive remedy is alive and well on both coasts of the United States.In New York, the state's Appellate Division, 2nd Department, ruled that an employer that violated federal immigration law by hiring two undocumented aliens did not lose its exclusive remedy protection from claims filed by those workers after they were injured at work.In New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 11:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
"The motion [to dismiss] is denied as moot," wrote the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 3:33 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Federal prosecutors in the eastern district of New York last week secured a conviction in the case of United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Jeremy Clare The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed an arbitration award and granted attorney’s fees in favor the defendant because the plaintiffs’ claims were meritless and lacked any proper purpose. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am by Lee Davis
”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am by Lee Davis
The full Sixth Circuit should grant a pending request for a rehearing and reverse the panel’s damaging ruling.Editorial in Sunday, September 23, 2012 New York Times [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 7:49 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The United State Attorney in Manhattan submitted a newly amended complaint on Friday in the forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]