Search for: "4th Judicial District Court" Results 961 - 980 of 1,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2009, 1:54 am
Shortly before he was scheduled to be released from prison in 2006, the state used the law passed by the Legislature earlier that same year by asking that the Mental Health Board of the 4th Judicial District deem him a dangerous sex offender. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  The Court opined that the statutory exemption “endorsed the approach of the First District” in another CEQA “parking impacts” case, San Francisco Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm by legalinformatics
An experience that occurs in Labor Courts, one of the pioneer instances to implement automation lawsuit tools in all its districts and in the creation of a fully electronic pilot project district should be highlighted in the Brazilian national scenario, in comparison to a Common Justice District, which is based on traditional, paper processing practices. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 4:11 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Court noted that Plaintiffs’ assertions concerning zoning based on geographic areas, swept too broadly and, if correct, would invalidate flood plain and platting regulations, airport buffer and other regulations based on distance, and urban renewal districts. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:46 pm by Brad Pauley
The Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven, held in a published opinion People v. [read post]
  In terms of average civil cases per judge, the Northern, Eastern, Central, and Southern District Courts rank 11th, 4th, 11th, and 76th nationally.[2] Ibarra v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:12 pm by Dan Bushell
  Relying on 2009 decisions of the 3rd and 4th DCAs, the Fifth District recently held in Andrews v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm by Kalvis Golde
A federal district court in Virginia agreed with the challengers and ordered TJ to stop using the new admissions policy. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:41 pm by Josh Blackman
Rather, the prosecutor exercised executive power: By contrast, "[e]very court and every party" has acknowledged that the court-appointed prosecutors in this case did not exercise judicial power. 38 F. 4th, at 306 (Menashi, J., dissenting). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:11 pm by David Ettinger
In “A Second Crack at Prop. 8” in last Wednesday’s Daily Journal [subscription required], Second District Court of Appeal senior judicial attorney Phil Goar has written a thoughtful article about California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, which allows various non-California-state courts to ask the California Supreme Court to answer questions of California law. [read post]