Search for: "Andrews v. Andrews"
Results 961 - 980
of 7,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 9:31 am
Seaport Investments Limited, Seymore Henry Sweeney Carol Sweeney v Andrew Cameron, Mitchell Bailey, John Crooks and the Attorney-General [1999] NIQB 1943 This case concerns rights of way across a property near the Giant's Causeway known as Runkerry House. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Earlier this year, Penman was linked to a case in the Court of Session - A398/14 Ladykirk Estates Ltd v Stormonth Darling WS : Ladykirk Estates Limited, Academy House, Shedden Park Road, Kelso, (Ledingham Chalmers Llp) Roxburghshire AG V Stormonth Darling W.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
When the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in Perez v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:57 am
In Universal Electronics Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:01 am
Court of Appeals, in Hillsborough County v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:11 am
Supreme Court’s April 19 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:58 am
Progressive law school opinion has never made its peace with Milliken v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 4:42 am
V. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 3:03 am
“State-run retirement plans are the wrong way to protect the poor” [Andrew G. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 10:05 am
In ANDREWS v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:01 am
Court of Appeals, in Hillsborough County v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
., v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 10:30 pm
I draw this lesson from discussions in Naomi Cahn and June Carbone’s wonderful new book, Red Families v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:20 pm
Behrend, Standard Fire v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:10 am
From SSRN:David Grenardo, How A Person of Faith Can Address Imposter Syndrome in Law School, (Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, Considerations, Forthcoming 2023).Hilary Hogan, The Right to Life and The State’s Investigative Obligations: Fox v Minister for Justice, (November 15, 2022).Andrew Coan, What Is the Matter with Dobbs? [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:43 am
Having been involved in the recent Actavis v Lilly Supreme Court case, and indeed some of the earlier leading decisions as well, Andrew will take participants through the history and implications of Actavis v Lilly and lead the debate: Actavis, interpretation and file wrapper – what do we do now? [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:01 am
In a ruling late in the night, the day before Thanksgiving, the Supreme Court issued a preliminary injunction against Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, preventing him from imposing restrictions on how many people could attend houses of worship—restrictions that Governor Cuomo defended as necessary to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:00 pm
On Monday, CalBizLit posted here about Conte v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 1:43 pm
Fed, most notably, but SEC v. [read post]
