Search for: "Angell v. Angell" Results 961 - 980 of 8,680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
However, the agency acknowledged most of the marijuana sold in Los Angeles and the Bay Area is domestically produced. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by administrator
On June 19, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided the case of Desertrain v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by administrator
On June 19, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided the case of Desertrain v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 2:48 pm
The Los Angeles Times reports that the FCC is waiting to rule on its indecency complaints against broadcast licensees until after the Supreme Court rules on FCC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:04 am
In Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:55 am
I usually don't comment about -- or, truthfully, even read all of the -- unpublished opinions by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:33 am
Okay, I agree that public entities can't be liable except as provided by statute. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:12 pm
There are lots of police misconduct/shooting cases in which the officer has acted pretty egregiously. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:53 pm
Today's opinion from the California Supreme Court is a close one (4-3), but ultimately holds that municipalities can be required to turn over under the Public Records Act some billing records sent by outside law firms -- at least for litigation that has already concluded.The second paragraph of Judge Werdegar's dissent suggests that she's not fond of the ruling, and also provides a reminder that we all need to make sure to proofread one final time to ensure that any "track… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:04 pm
It's rare to read an opinion regarding a trial in a routine civil case -- here, an automobile accident involving the LAPD -- in which (1) the Court of Appeal reverses the jury's finding of no liability on multiple grounds, all of which are fairly pedestrian (application of requests for admission, limitation of cross-examination, whether a percipient witness deposition was admissible because the witness was unavailable, etc.), and (2) I find myself repeatedly saying to myself "Yes. [read post]