Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 961 - 980
of 3,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 7:46 am
Niki Kelly reports today on yesterday's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the case of Debra Barnett v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:46 pm
The trial court granted the petition, finding that Gentry had not survived Concepcion and that plaintiff’s claim under the Private Attorneys General Act was arbitrable on an individual basis. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:57 pm
On February 27, 2006, the Lindseys filed their Verified Petition in Huntington Superior Court, sending summons to the Attorney General, the ELJ, an IDEM attorney, and the attorney who had represented De Groot in the administrative proceeding, Todd Janzen ("Janzen"). [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:32 pm
This was affirmed by the superior court, except a dissenting justice determined the facility had no duty to protect the general public from the troubled man after he was properly discharged from the facility. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
E060038), the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Riverside County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate challenging an EIR for the Perris Dam Remediation Project. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
Superior Court of Tuolumne County (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., RPI) (5th Dist.10/30/12) ___ Cal.App.4th ___ 2012 WL 5350450, the Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate directing the Superior Court to overrule a demurrer it had sustained without leave to two causes of action of a CEQA writ petition. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:44 pm
First, the relator must establish that no court order governs possession of the child by asserting that no order has been rendered or that an earlier order is void or invalid to support a superior right of possession. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
See Getting v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2005 FC 925 (Federal Court) and Davis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Rosenblatt v The Nuplexa Group Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 11:07 am
It was initially filed in " state court" December 2008 (Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 30-2008-00116748-CU-MC-CJC), and was removed to the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:14 pm
The Attorney General appealed, and as the Court of Appeal pointed out, he had to show reversible error on all three grounds in order to get a reversal. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
The Associated Press v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
In my 34 years as a family law attorney, I have filed and won one family court Writ. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am
Under State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 5:49 pm
Superior Court and Brinkley v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
