Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 961 - 980 of 3,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 8:55 am by Leah Litman
This morning, the Supreme Court handed down Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:44 am by Scott Bomboy
A divided Supreme Court said on Monday that a Colorado baker and cake artist was wrongly censored by the state of Colorado for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding party. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Collins v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause, and Lagos v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am by Rachel Bercovitz
  Grayson Clary summarized the Fourth Circuit’s May 9 decision in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
Here’s how a judge on Montana’s Supreme Court answered the question in sizing up the parol evidence rule in Baker v Bailey, 240 Mont. 139 [Mo. 1989]: As this case illustrates, application of the rule can work to create harsh results. [read post]
19 May 2018, 7:17 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Sarah Grant reported the latest from the military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Reflecting on the Supreme Court’s April 24 decision in Jesner v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm by Hayley Evans
Circuit Court’s judgment affirming Judge Tanya Chutkan’s April 19 transfer injunction in Doe v. [read post]