Search for: "BILLINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT v BILLING" Results 961 - 980 of 1,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2009, 10:37 am
Last year, the Supreme Court, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:29 am
Barr Labs (No. 06-830)[Tamoxifen] :The Eastern District of New York granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, reasoning that because the monopoly extension came within the patent context, it did not amount to an unreasonable restraint on trade. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:25 am by David Strifling
  As recently as 2011, in Lake Beulah Management District v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am by Amy Howe
Board of Education, which outlawed racial segregation in public schools, Baker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The application to set aside service of the writ and amended statement of claim is dismissed [77] In Giani v Queensland Television ([2015] QDC 286) the District Court struck out part of the defence of contextual truth and a plea in mitigation. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
” Jerry de Jaager of the University of Chicago Law School discusses a recent visit by Justice Scalia for that school’s alumni magazine. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Etta Lanum
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Bill Mears at Fox News, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Autumn Callan at Jurist, and Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 7:23 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
In the meantime, with the Senate technically still in session, new broadband-related bills continue to be introduced. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:26 pm by Eugene Lee
Grant Joint Union High School Dist., the court ruled that a school principal's report to a school district that a male PE teacher was peeping in the girls' locker room was not protected from retaliation. (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1378, 1384-1385. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Huq, University of Chicago – Law School. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Solove and Danielle Keats Citron, George Washington University Law School and University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]