Search for: "BURKS v. STATE"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 1:01 pm
On the morning of the hearing, Kirsha Kaechele led twenty-five women dressed in navy power suits, pearls, and red lipstick into the courtroom.[28] In a blog post, the artist describes how they “moved in silent synchronicity, crossing and uncrossing their pantyhosed legs [pause], leaning forward in their navy suits [pause], peering over their tortoiseshell spectacles [pause], and applying lipstick” for two hours straight.[29] Even the judge noted their behavior in his ruling,… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
In SEC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 11:51 am
Burk, Marc A. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
O’Brien had paid IR£30,000 to former minister, Ray Burke. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:45 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Whitney Holding Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
And two linked articles from Lexology on reforming Scots charity law: Kirstyn Burke: Charity Law Reform in Scotland: Part 1: Charities (Regulation and Administration) (Scotland) Bill – what happens next? [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 6:13 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Bentley v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
Accordingly, Solum and Chiang challenge the effectiveness of the solutions proposed by previous studies, which focused upon the tools to be used for interpretation (which suggested looking to unbiased third-party sources such as dictionaries and encyclopaedias, to the patentee’s own usage in the patent specification, or to expert testimony), and reject the idea that claim text be innately defective (see Burk and Lemley here). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
The reasoning of these decisions varied at times, but the theme was consistent and widely understood that "a series of steps for conducting business could not be patented" (at pages 26-27 of his decision Justice Stevens cited several such cases including US Credit Sys Co v American Credit Indem Co (1893), Hotel Security Checking Co v Lorraine Co (1908), Loew's Drive-In Theatres, Inc v Park-In Theatres, Inc (1949)). [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:05 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:58 am
One member pointed out that this is a revival of the old 1980s Skadden v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 11:28 pm
” (See, e.g., Presbyterian Church in the United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:31 pm
United States, 72 Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
" Farrell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm
The lead opinion carried the signatures of only two Justices, Justices Kilbride and Burke. [read post]
