Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:38 pm
which was "reinvented" by a "more conservative" California Supreme Court in the 1992 case of Knight v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
Its opinion in the Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
Non-Enforcement Matters Helpful Guidance for Investment Advisers on California Lobbyist Law A number of questions have arisen around the implementation of California’s new law requiring placement agents to register as lobbyists pursuant to the California Political Reform Act. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Greenwire (via the New York Times), Bloomberg, and Courthouse News Service all report on the Court’s decision not to hear a challenge to the EPA’s ban on the pesticide carbofuran (National Corn Growers v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Marcia Coyle: A First Amendment challenge to California's ban on the sale or rental to minors of violent video games now holds the dubious record for the longest pending case. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:02 am
” The Concepcion opinion, authored by Justice Scalia, seemingly ignored federalism precedent by finding that California’s Discover Bank Rule, Discover Bank v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:00 am
The Los Angeles Times this morning runs the following editorial on AT&T v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
5/9/2011 Guest: Michael Froomkin Free Expression International More Issues in Free Expression Photo by sheriffmitchell This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
Weekly D884cHOSPITAL WORKERS MUST ABIDE BY SMOKING BAN, 3RD CIRCUIT RULES, Armstrong County Mem'l Hosp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
In the case of H v Eason Area School District (12 April 2011) a federal judge prevented a Pennsylvania school district from enforcing its ban on “I ? [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 6:32 am
This holding leaves the states with no clear way to ban contracts that insulate companies from liability through class proceeding waivers. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm
For one, state supreme courts, led by the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:15 pm
It means companies now have the power to ban class actions against them and force consumers to bring individual lawsuits, no matter how small the amount of money at stake. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that declared a class waiver ban unenforceable under California law. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:05 pm
Everyone has and continues to wait with concern the Court's decision in Dukes v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm
For example, it very explicitly bans state regulation of automobile emissions with the exception of California. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
There is a line of cases starting with Talley v California, then McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm’n, and running through the more recent Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in which the Supreme Court sets out a sweeping constitutional right to anonymous religious and political speech. [read post]
