Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 961 - 980 of 14,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 10:34 pm by Patricia Salkin
  The Court stated: It first bears noting that the precise definition of “zoning” is difficult to delineate…. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
However, they could not join the majority's holding that the defendant bears the burden of producing juror testimony on the question of harm. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
At least not for purposes of filing a habeas corpus petition.The case is The Nonhuman Rights Project v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:26 am by Jason Rantanen
Gannon stated that the government believes this case arises under the patent laws. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Supreme Court decisions have interpreted this right as applying to those who "bear testimony. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]