Search for: "Best v. State of Maryland"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2009, 7:12 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:08 pm
These states also rank among the bluest states in the nation.Illinois has one of the best records of electing blacks (and Democrats generally) to public office, and it is the home of the nation's first black president and the Great Emancipator. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Pfizer Inc., 867 N.Y.S.2d 425 (N.Y.A.D. 2008) (state appellate holding that plaintiff's home state controls on choice of law; similar to, but much better than, Desiano); (15) Vanderwerf v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 4:45 pm
Moreno, Cleburne v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
" Even pre-Crawford, I have obtained many successes defending against Maryland state drug prosecutions, based on Maryland's statutory law keeping drug certificates of analysis out of evidence if the defense files a demand for the chemist's testimony at least five days before trial and if the chemist does not appear at trial. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
The debate, which was initially a state-by-state affair, was refocused when ALI decided to write a new restatement of products liability law in 1991. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:09 am
Most educated progressives want to believe that education causes people to embrace liberal agendas and that perhaps, finally, most voters have now learned that the liberal label works best. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 2:09 pm
A fantastic resource on this topic is the book Maryland Rules Commentary, by Paul V. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:47 pm
Last week in Baddou v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
Maryland Casualty Co., 90 NY2d 274 [1997]). [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
He also relies on United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:21 pm
Marshall, a tireless advocate for equal rights throughout his career, was best known for his victory in Brown v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:41 pm
Nov. 1, 2006) and Bank of America Corporation v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:57 pm
Love 522 U.S. 67 and U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
