Search for: "Booker v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,047
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2016, 1:12 am
Then, as now, he concealed the defendant's name (calling the case "US v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
The 3rd Circuit affirmed that in 2008, but last week the Supreme Court vacated that decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Smith v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
Reproductive rights Barr did not distance himself from his past assertion that Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
, v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
, v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am
Harris and Booker, as members of the Judiciary Committee, have an opportunity to produce a viral soundbite in hearings. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
That system lasted until 2005, when the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
A woman v Hemel Hempstead Gazette, 10.9.13. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:39 am
Here are some of its concluding paragraphs:Unlike in State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
See Scott v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 9:31 am
See Scott v. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:07 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:27 pm
In the federal system, imposition of a sentence within the guidelines range was mandatory until the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
